One of the hot topics in Florida – specifically Polk County – is the education system. Many feel that it is a flawed system, and in certain regards it might be. It certainly isn’t run as efficiently as most successful businesses are, but then again, what government system is? In my opinion, there’s too much in the way of politics to ever have any public service group run efficiently — at least the way our society works right now.
One thing that Polk County is considering – though has stated publicly would be a last resort – is to furlough 10 days throughout the year, increase employee contribution to health care, and cut salaries by up to 7%. This being on top of the new Governor’s hopes to switch the current Pension Plan for all state employees from State funded to employee funded. All of these things seem like sensible things to do, with one caveat: state employees don’t get paid enough as it is, and those benefits are one of the few perks that make it worth it for teachers to get into the business in the first place. Don’t get me wrong, I love teaching. Very few people do it that don’t enjoy it, or do it for very long. But if all these cuts are made, people are going to have to make a decision whether to continue teaching, or support their families. You’ll still have teachers who have wealthy spouses, or that really can’t do anything else (and there are some of those out there, unfortunately). But I have a feeling that a large portion of the rest will bow out.
Most of this stems from the over $3 billion Florida legislators are expecting to be short with regards to their budget. Always you hear about tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts. You also hear about wanting to save jobs. In my mind, you can’t have both. I think it’s time to actually raise taxes slightly, or, heaven’s forbid, introduce a very mild state income tax. When you decide to penalize your teachers, firefighters, and police force to give corporate tax breaks, something is seriously wrong with the system.
Another hot topic that has been talked about for several years now is a switch to a Voucher program, where the State gives families a certain amount of money to have their child attend whatever school they want, whether it be public or private.
The general populace seems to have this great notion that the teaching in private schools is far superior to that which goes on in the public system. To be honest, the level of teacher at each isn’t very different, if the quality differs at all. The MAIN difference is that parents pay, and students can get kicked out of said private institution much easier. Yes, that also means that some of the truly bad teachers can be fired much more easily, but there aren’t as many of those teachers as you’d think. If the state goes to vouchers, I envision a three tiered system: public contains only poverty ridden students with parents that are not invested in their students, a lower end private system that is about the same as public schools today, because it would still be “free” (think vouchers) to the parents, and the upper end schools. Nothing really changes, except students in poverty getting an even bigger shaft. So again, nothing changes except a widening divide in the social class structure.
Finally, we have the Pay Per Performance, which I had a nice chat with a co-worker about last week, and somewhat tied to this – doing away with the pension program. My co-worker had the idea of doing away with the pension program and replacing it with a rotating 5 year contract instead of pension. This I actually like quite a bit, and think that a 3-5 year contract keeps some sense of job security with teachers, while giving the ability to get rid of teachers who can’t hang with teaching anymore, or have become disenchanted/burnt out, and no longer care, but still need the job. I also don’t have an issue with the Pay Per Performance, IF done correctly. I think this cannot be taken on a one year basis, however, nor can it be compared to state averages. There are so many variables that go into how well a student does on the FCAT, that there is no WAY you can directly attribute the learning gains success to one teacher. How effective that student’s other teachers are, family issues that are going on, major social events or upheavals, illness on test day – all of these things effect how the student does on this test. It is also not fair to judge a teacher teaching in a migrant, poverty ridden school where parents work 2 jobs and simply don’t have time to properly assist and monitor the education of their child to that of an average wealthy community. But if you modify this so that it is on a 3 year average, and matched only with school historical averages combined with similar socio-economic environments (yet slanted more towards those same school averages), you’ve got something I think most teachers would buy into.
What actually happens, we’ll see. Sadly, most people just don’t understand all of the factors involved, or simply don’t care, and will always vote for someone who simply promises “lower taxes” to “save the economy.” I’m not sure what the answer is to fix our current economy, but I certainly don’t think penalizing the public servants is the answer. Teachers, policemen, and fire fighters already don’t get paid enough for all that they do.